Incident Workgroup Changes

Questions/Comments for the Forms Advisory Committee Meeting

Tuesday, February 9, 2021

1:08 PM

Summary Group changes

• FAC combined the reported by group into the Witness/involved group

• No of stolen Motor Vehicles and No of Recovered Motor Vehicles put in the Property Group

Violation/Offence Group

Does every offense need a new location or just one location for the incident?

Individual/Offender/Subject Group

• What do you want to call this group? Individual will be on the back end, UFAD uses subject on the front end

• Removed Parent Group and combined it into the Witness/involved group

• What should be the total number for this group, FAC wanted to reduce the amount because in reality 99 will cause issues with speed?

Victim Group

What should be the total number for this group, FAC wanted to reduce the amount because in reality 99 will cause issues with speed?

Involvement Group

• Combined group with links to other groups. Combined reported by, parent, witness.

• What should be the total number for this group? This group will not have as many issues as the other 2 it will have less programming and no subgroups.

• Add fields to make it work with parent linking and reported by

  • Need to like who they are the parent off.

  • Like if they are a victim/subject reporting themselves

Property Group

No of stolen Motor Vehicles and No of Recovered Motor Vehicles

Modifications Since April 16th 2020

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

9:17 AM

Property Form

• Removed form number fields

• Added Impounded location table

• Filtered tables per DOJ

  • Property types that could be cross groups will be sorted after the fact so officer just put in items by type

  • Added Value field to drug group

• Questions

  • Should we expand the drug type field to include the list from the state lab of hygiene?

• Adjusted recovered fields and value fields gray and enable based on loss type.

• Enable Disable Measurement vs value fields based on loss type for drugs. Only loss type of seized gets measurement fields.

• TODO

  • Report

Incident Form

• Gang Activity field

  • Received the list of 900 gangs in WI from the DOC.

  • Created a violation search for the list

  • Implemented the list into the incident form for Subject, Victim and Other Person

• eReferral Agency Field

  • Created a button to look up the appropriate DA from the location.

  • Added Batch Rule "WARNING: The Location of the Incident and the eReferral Agency(DA) is inconsistent"

• Attempted Completed Field

  • Disabled if certain offense and marked as completed all others enabled.

• Modifier field

  • Split into two fields. Enhancing factor and Reducing factor

• Relationship field

  • Added Not Applicable

  • Changed Offender to Self

• Total fields

  • Preset the values and set rules to make sure values are entered

• Add Unknown Victim Type

• Fixed the issue with the disappearing victim groups when violation changed.

• Added programming to adjust Dynamic lists if main linking group deleted. The fields affected by dynamic lists are

  • Arrest Group -->Associated Offenses

  • Individual(Subject) Group--> Associated Offenses

  • Relationships -->Associated Offenses

  • Relationships -->Offender

  • Other Person -->Linked To

  • Other Person-->Parent OF

  • Property-->Associated Offenses

  • Victim-->Associated Offenses

  • Individual(subject) Group --> Relationship offender

• Reports

  • Office

• DAIT/Workgroup Rules See listing of batch rules.

  •  

• TO DO

  • Move Violation Group Fields

  • XSLT for multi enhancer

  • Test Transmission for DAIT

  • Reports

    • Public

    • Redacted

  • Lock Down Property Group

  • Utility forms

  • All Statutes need offense Codes (waiting on DOJ to finish).

Attachment Form

• TO DO

  • Version up adding new fields

  • Create xslt for DAIT

  • Add rules for DAIT

F2 Help

• Generated and put on Share Point

• TO DO

  • DOJ

  • DA

  • FAC

Meeting 5/14/2020 Agenda

Thursday, May 7, 2020

7:45 AM

AGENDA

1. Summary of work (Geri)

2. Violation(Offense) Fields (DOJ)

3. Loss type with Measure vs Value for Drugs (DOJ)

4. Property demo

5. DOJ to receive property data

   1. with the incident form (a summary)

      1. Linked to offenses

   2. with the property form (raw data)

      1. Not linked to offenses

6. DOJ receive raw xml in Fall idea

7. F2 Help

July 15, 2020 - Meeting Notes

Thursday, July 9, 2020

7:32 AM

Location: Conference Call (Working Remotely)

Date: July 15, 2020 at 3:00 PM

Attendees:

Took Notes:

• Update on Progress

  • FORS Issue Richland Center

    • Grabs data from database

  • Timing for appointments

    • Only 12 per month?

• New Virtual Computer

  • BadgerConversion

• Review Access rights in Hosted Distribution items needed Next meeting

  • Geri removed the following access rights from system admin and give to developer access

    • Edit

• Go over documentation

  • Pre-Migration

  • In-Between Appointments

  • Post Appointment

Modifications Since June 18th 2020

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

9:17 AM

Property Form

• Auto populate/replicate complete

  • Just Basic Auto populate fields.

• Report

• TODO

  • "Law Enforcement Agency Type" field not auto populating

Incident Form

• Moved Violation Group Fields to document and made into buttons

• XSLT

  • XSLT for multi enhancer

• Utility Forms

• Autopopulate/replicate complete

  • Basics for all forms to incident

  • DNR/ELCI/NTC replicate all fields on the ticket to the incident form

• Property Group Locked Down

• Public Report

• Added Rule for Count which is required to DAIT

• Transmission to DAIT

• TO DO

  • Reports

    • Redacted

Attachment Form

• New Version

• Created xslt5

• Added rules for DAIT transmission

• Autopopulate/replicate complete

• Transmission to DAIT

• TO DO

  • "Law Enforcement Agency Type" field not auto populating

F2 Help

• DOJ

• TO DO

  • DA

  • FAC

Modifications Since September 24th 2020

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

9:17 AM

Property Form

• TODO

  • "Law Enforcement Agency Type" field not auto populating

  • F2 Help

Incident Form

• Added Rule for Count which is required to DAIT

• Transmission to DAIT

• TO DO

  • Reports

    • Redacted

Attachment Form

• Transmission to DAIT

• TO DO

  • "Law Enforcement Agency Type" field not auto populating

Supplemental Form

• Created

• Went to FAC and got form flow

• Rules Created, identical to Attachment form

• Reports

  • DAIT report

• Created xslt to DAIT

• TO DO

  • Add instructions for transmission

  • Add to available form

  • Actions

  • Access rights

  • DB Build

  • Testing

    • Agency Field Blank

  • F2 Help

F2 Help

• DOJ

• TO DO

  • DA

  • FAC

Transmission Scenario's

Thursday, October 15, 2020

10:37 AM

1. Scenario 1

   1. One defendant (person) Two victims (people)

   2. Two witnesses

   3. Misdemeanor Battery – 940.19(1) against first victim

   4. Substantial Battery – 940.19(2) against second victim

2. Scenario 2

   1. One Defendant

   2. 3 charges –

      1. OWI 3^rd,

      2. Operating with PAC 3^rd

      3. Possession of a Firearm by a Felon – 941.29(1m)(a)

3. Scenario 3

   1. Two defendants  

   2. One victim

   3. Each defendant committed

      1. Battery – 940.19(1)

      2. Robbery with use of Force – 943.32(1)(a) against the victim

4. Scenario 4

   1. One Defendant

   2. One Victim

   3. One witness

   4. 2 charges

      1. Disorderly Conduct – 947.01(1) against victim with a domestic abuse charge enhancer

      2. Resisting Arrest (no victim) – 946.41(1)

5. Scenario 5

   1. Two defendants

   2. One victim

   3. First defendant: 

      1. Possession of Meth 961.41(3g)(g)

      2. Obstructing an officer – 946.41(1)

   4. Second defendant: 

      1. Possession of Meth,

      2. Carrying a concealed weapon – 941.23(2),

      3. Receiving Stolen Firearm or property (> $5000 - $10000) – 943.34(1)(bm) against victim

6. Scenario 6

   1. One defendant

   2. One victim

   3. First degree intentional homicide – 940.01(1)(a) with the Attempt modifier

7. Scenario 7

   1. 2 defendants 

   2. 1 victim (a store, like Walmart)

   3. Each defendant is charged with Retail Theft (>$5000 - $10000) – 943.50(1m)(a)

Things to consider for testing

1. Subject

   1. Person

   2. Non-Person

2. Victim

   1. Person

   2. Non-Person

3. Violation

   1. One

   2. More than one

   3. One Enhancer

   4. Two Enhancer

   5. Modifier

4. Other Person

   1. Witness

   2. Officer Witness

5. Location

   1. On road

   2. Address

6. Need an Arrest

7. Need a Double Transmit

8. Hair color Conversions for Victims, Subjects and Other Person

   1. Blond

   2. Unknown

9. Try leaving fields blank

Race Ethnicity

Monday, December 14, 2020

11:22 AM

DMV's Race Codes:

PROTECT Conversion Table:

Milwaukee’s request per ACLU:

• Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander   (DMV - Asian)

• Black/African American  (DMV - Black)

• Hispanic

• American Indian or Alaskan Native (Remove Indian)    (DMV - Indian)

• White

• Unknown  (This won’t be needed, since it is not a required field for DMV and they can leave it blank)

NIBRS Race: W, B, I, A, P, U,

NIBRS Ethnicity: H, N, U,

Use of Force "Race/Ethnicity": W, B, I, A, P, H, Unknown, Pending

Use of Force & Arrest Related Deaths (UFAD):

Ethnicity Field:

V2Race in TraCS (Same as the DMV - Race)

V2CCAPRace

Codes - NCIC Race (TEG Table - Not used in Wisconsin TraCS)

Questions

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

7:51 AM

• Exceptional Clearance Indicator Field: If I’m remembering correctly, I think you had originally added this field in the Summary section, but you may have temporarily removed it when we expressed indecision about whether we wanted this moved to the Offense section.  Am I remembering that correctly, and could this field be added back into your Incident form as a Summary-level field?  It is used to communicate if every offense associated with the Incident should be considered cleared, due to an exceptional reason (such as the death of the suspect).

• 2.  Cargo Theft Indicator Field: I don’t believe that we ever talked about this field.  This is the only field that I’m aware of that exists in our spec, and not in the Incident form, that we’ve never talked about.  Could we add a Summary-level checkbox that would be used to indicate whether Cargo Theft was involved in the Incident?  Potentially “Involved Cargo Theft” would work as the wording, but we can discuss this in a future meeting. This field had been recently added by the FBI, and was added to our Wisconsin WIBRS spec in January of 2019.  You may not have identified it if you were originally working from an older copy of our Tech Spec.  I’m attaching our (current) January 2019 spec in case you don’t have that.

• 3.  Deleting Incident Records: In one of our meetings a few months ago, you had discussed a few options for how TraCS could possibly handle communicating to us that a record should be deleted.  Could you remind me of how that might work, and how that might appear in the XML transmission?

Modifications Since December 15th 2020

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

9:17 AM

Property/Evidence Form

• Merged Property and Evidence

• TODO

  • "Law Enforcement Agency Type" field not auto populating

  • F2 Help

Incident Form

Rules added to current

1. Jan Pack-Bugs

   1. Incident form not transmitting to RMS when only RMS is chosen

   2. Agency Tables now transfer to field units

Added fields for DOJ

1. documentIncidentType

   1. Multi field

   2. Replacing Agency Report Only

   3. Choices

• 01-Agency Internal Report Only -- only choice

• 02-No Incidents to DOJ for Month -- only choice

• 03-DA eReferral

• 04-WIBRS Report

1. documentReportingMonth used only for (02)

2. documentReportingYear used only for (02)

3. summaryCargoTheftFlag

• Added Property Section

• Updated all rules to be excluded when DOJ No Report.

• Added DOJ rules for

1. Incident

2. Offense

Offender

Arrest

TO DO

1. Reports

2. Remove date of birth on public report for other person

Attachment Form

• TO DO

  • "Law Enforcement Agency Type" field not auto populating

Supplemental Form

• TO DO

  • Add instructions for transmission

  • Add to available form

  • Actions

  • Access rights

  • DB Build

  • Testing

    • Agency Field Blank

  • F2 Help

F2 Help

• DOJ

• TO DO

  • DA

  • FAC

Questions Feb 2021

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

10:17 AM

we tried to do an informational report no offense or subject associated to it, it will not let us delete the offense or subject group.  And for the top part it won’t let us put a 0 in for total offenses.  Not sure if you able to open our form up but here is the number

Open

Modifications Since February 10th 2020

Wednesday, April 29, 2020

9:17 AM

Evidence Form

• Started Rules

• Started Ribbon

• Reports

  • 3 started

    • Gun Destruction

    • Crime Lab

    • Receipt

  • 2 in planning stage

    • Chain of Custody

    • Bar code

• Meeting

  • Set batch rules

• TODO

  • F2 Help

Incident Form

• F2 Help Complete

• Added fields for DOJ

  • Moved additional homicide circumstances to AggAssault group

  • Adjusted the field names

  • WIBRS Race for Victim and Subject

• Added DOJ rules for

  • Aggravated Assault

  • Relationships

  • Victim over 17 cannot have an offense of statutory rape

  • Non person Victim linked to crime against person incorrectly

  • Property loss

    • Property Item

    • Drug

• Modified form to prohibit other offense types if Justified homicide chosen

  • Pop up message after putting in Justified Homicide

  • Validation Batch rule set up to prevent.

• Modified all rules

  • Specify if DAIT rules

    • ERROR(DA)

  • Specify if DOJ rules

    • ERROR(WIBRS)

  • Specify if both

    • ERROR(WIBRS/DA)

• TO DO

  • Reports

  • Remove date of birth on public report for other person

Attachment Form

• F2 Help Complete

• TO DO

  • "Law Enforcement Agency Type" field not auto populating

Supplemental Form

• F2 Help Complete

• TO DO

  • Add instructions for transmission

  • Add to available form

  • Actions

  • Access rights

  • DB Build

  • Testing

    • Agency Field Blank

Crash Analysis report

Wednesday, April 21, 2021

8:33 AM

Open

April 2022 changes

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

9:49 AM

• Arrest Group rules added

  • Arrest Offense Required 

  • Arrest Type Required 

  • Multiple Arrestee Indicator Required 

  • Arrestee Armed With Required 

  • ATN Number Required 

• Probably(?) small changes:

  • Currently if Race = Hispanic, WIBRS Ethnicity cannot be Non-Hispanic. That’s correct. But Hispanic/Unknown WIBRS Ethnicity and Hispanic/blank WIBRS Ethnicity still work. Want if Race = Hispanic, WIBRS Ethnicity must = Hispanic.

  • ORI number in LEA area: should not be required. Currently get an error if left blank for an officer victim that it has to be 9 characters….but it should not be required at all. Blank is ok, even for officer victims.

  • Age ranges: if lower range is “unknown”, upper range should be required to be blank. Currently user can still put “unknown” as lower and a real age as upper.

  • Simple assault weapon options should be limited (a table change)?

    • This already happens

    • Open

      

  • Incident date when not known

    • The upper date can still be before the report date. Not logical that an incident was reported to the agency on 3/25 if agency says incident could’ve happened between 3/20 and 3/28

• Verbiage changes, if possible:

  • Victim type: can “law enforcement” say “law enforcement officer” so as to distinguish it from a law enforcement agency victim (which would be “government” vic type)?

    • This is your table.

  • Incident status: can “Clear Exception” say “Clear Status” instead? “Clear Exception” is very close to “Clear Exceptionally” and I have slight concern an agency would not understand the difference, and since no F2 button in that spot, they’d click Clear Exception when they really meant to add an exceptional clearance 

•  Date field considerations (maybe a future improvement topic if can’t be implemented now?):

  • Exceptional clearance date

    • Consider changing it from cant be before the incident date, to can't be before the report date

      • Currently, can have incident date (3/20), report date (3/27), and EC date (3/25). This is technically ok as validation is currently written since EC date is compared to incident date….but it is not logical that an incident would be cleared before it was reported to the agency.

  • Arrest date

    • Consider changing it from it can't be before the incident date, to can't be before the report date

      • Same reason as above

• List at meeting

  • statutory rape should have two victims and two offenders if all are under 18.

  • was able to validate form with offense of incest, subject offense rape, victim offense rape, relationship offense incest.  When changing offenses, fields aren't clearing properly.

    • Unable to fix at this time. I think it might be a baseline bug.

  • group B offenses and Group B Arrest Offense should be the same offense

  • if it's not a cargo theft reportable offense, then can that field just be grayed out?

    • Cannot do as the field is above the field determining gray out

  • currently allows arrest and EC- can't have both

  • chose vic was offender on stat rape then it grayed out second relationship-screenshot

    • Still working on this one

  • age for subject one was required and not for subject two

  • gray out prop value if drugs are prop desc and type loss is seized

• Sort Order set

  • V2WIBRSCallType

  • V2WIBRSVictimRelationship

  • V2WIBRSWeapon