Incident Workgroup Notes

Agenda - June 27, 2019

Thursday, June 27, 2019

8:43 AM

• What is the process for entering an incident? o How do you handle Arrests, Evidence, Property, Vehicles?

• What outputs do you want? o This may help identify what data elements we need. o Submit IBR data to DOJ/Feds o Evidence report?

• Where will data need to be sent to?

• DOJ

• DA

State/agency requirements

FINAL - Notes - June 27, 2019

Thursday, June 27, 2019

8:25 AM

TraCS Incident Form Work Group Meeting Notes

DSP De Forest Post – Large Conference Room

June 27, 2019 – 9:00 – 3:00 PM

Work Group Team / Attendees:

Introductions - Where are you from, what’s your area of responsibility and why are you here?

• Alesha Brown: DOJ - Works with Incident Based Reporting

• Derek Veitenheimer: DOJ - manager of the Incident Based Reporting

• Darlene Schwartz: DSP - TraCS program manager

• Aaron Covaleski: DSP - TraCS Summer Intern

• Brian Neil: DSP - TraCS Developer

• Geri Polster: DSP - TraCS Developer

• Dave Harvey: DSP--in the place of Mark Fetzer or Travis Lauer. DSP took a paper form and put into their own home grown system. Clumsy electronic form. Does summary based form. Issues with working in 72 different counties - each county wants something different. Need standardization. DSP does not have RMS.

• Jeni Lutz: UW Stevens Point PD--They use Sleet RMS - currently doing summary based program

• Candy Tork: Stevens Point PD--They use TriTech RMS. They state it is reaching its end of life. Portage CO. and Plover are looking for a new RMS. May be interested in TraCS.

• Kevin Barman: DNR--Currently uses a Word document for their Incident form. Doesn't work for UCR or RMS. Lots of work now for reporting and inaccurate.

• Daniel Heimann: Ho-Chuck Nation PD--small agency. They don't have an RMS. May be interested in TraCS. Currently uses a word form. They are in 15 counties. Every DA has different format.

• Timothy McCormack: State Capitol PD--Want to provide input into form at the ground floor. They currently have an RMS.

• Bryan Hasse: Town of Beloit--TraCS admin, was on FAC. They use Spillman along with their entire county (Rock CO). Nice for standardization. Not sure how it works. They are struggling with Spillman 200 errors. A mess right now. They also use Spillman to do their report writing and their evidence reporting, booking, etc.

• Stanley Ridgeway: Durand PD--Omega RMS wants to get rid of current system.

• Shawn McGee: Hartford Township PD--asking for it all the time so since loud mouth about should help. Uses word document. One central area makes more sense

• Brenda Ray: DA IT-eReferrals from Law Enforcement- has schema

• Booker Ferguson: Sparta PD--has RMS wants to see how it will work. Flexability.

On Skype / Phone

Tim Strohbusch: Clear Lake PD, same conversation all over country. Don't have an RMS. Help standardize collection. Officers easily fill out a new form. Thinks it will be easy to build but hard to integrate into TraCS.

Demo from Iowa

• Josh Halterman TraCS National Program Manager

  • Josh was willing to remote in and show our group how Iowa uses their Incident form as well as their evidence and arrest forms and how they work (validation rules, work flow, etc)

• NIBRS form.

  • Turns on and off the validation rules with an .ini file.

    • When on it performs the validations in TraCS.

    • When off it exports to XML for RMS to import and process.

  • They allow for a Date and Time range to be used on the form.

  • Collect data imports into RMS no reporting or uses ini setting

  • Transmits to Department of Public Safety

  • Master charge code table.

    • Everyone uses the same charging table in Iowa.

    • Login checks for updates and grabs updated table.

    • Contains UCR codes from the charge

      • Statutes with multiple UCR codes have the codes displayed on a pick list.

  • Local ordinance tables may need to have UCR codes added.

  • Lesser offence

    • Potential

  • 2 narratives one for public release

  • Property crimes very complicated.

    • Validation rules for victim(s)

      • If the type is not allowed, then give an error

      • I.e. Trespassing, the victim type must be Society (not the property owner)

  • Case validations rules

  • If the initial report is referred, than a supplemental form is issued.

    • Example a Supplemental report for a detective.

    • Goes along with the original NIBRS form as a follow up report

    • Does not duplicate the UCR Statute

• Arrest form

  • This form is not transmitted

• ECAT – Evidence Collection and Tracking

  • Track through entire life cycle.

    • Sent to different locations

    • Tested returned or in a box

    • Linked evidence list with evidence management system.

  • Form transmits to Evident Management System

  • One piece of evidence per form.

    • Have replicate ability to create additional forms.

  • Amending

    • Open, Edit, Validate and Retransmit

  • Logging

    • Does no capture which fields were changed.

    • If captured all changes, the log file would be huge.

• Iowa form Stability

  • The incident form is pretty stable. No major changes in the last 3 years.

  • Validation rules are continually updated.

Badger TraCS Forms Questions and how it works in relation to Iowa's

• Ordinance

  • Already have UCR Code field.

• Arrest report

  • Use for multiple incidents transfer the information from arrest to the multiple incidents.

  • Use for an warrant arrests from other agencies.

• Master Index

  • Can already do in WI

  • Who maintains the Master Index? How we set up or configure TraCS forms maintains the master index fairly well.

• Logging changes

  • Citations only after issuance

• Large Attachments

  • File upload on attachment form.

  • Limiting size to 2 mg and store in the database.

  • Files over 2 mg are the local agencies responsibility to store.

Review "draft" Incident Form Work Group Charter

• Committee Resources: Discussion

  • Is TraCS a good option for the Incident form?

    • DSP and DNR plan to use it

    • It may be a little different than Iowa's form with DNR included

  • It's not a question of should it happen, the challenge is everyone has a different scenario, with initial roll out, is it going to meet everybody's basic needs

    • Having form abilities to replace Spillman would be great for one, but not necessarily everyone

    • Maybe the intention is start at the base level, as it grows, we'll add as needed. No rush, can be a 2 -3 year process. Messaging is important, not meant to be a total replacement, it's a start. Overtime it will improve. Filling a void. (Filling a need, not replacing, give an option)

    • Base level fills a void, fills a need but not mandatory

      • Not a question if it "should happen", just need to try and meet everyone's basic requirements

    • Be cognizant of those agencies that already have an RMS, we don't want them to spend a lot to import the data into their RMS.

    • Not replacing RMS

    • Can we import data and can we share info. with other agencies? How do we import outside information?

      • Madison PD - has a central database and hosts 8-10 other local agencies. The have an agreement, not sure if or how they share data

      • DOT/DSP looking at setting up a centralized DB using Web Services for small agencies that are still on Access. Initially, there may not be data sharing, but getting small agencies off of Access. Down the road can look at Sharing.

      • Information Sharing is of high interest, but that is in the future. Need to focus on collecting the incident data first.

• Purpose: Discussion

  • Don't sell as a replacement, not shooting for the stars off the bat.

  • This isn't about the RMS, the main objective is the need for an incident form.

  • This is an incident form only. Add something about identifying other associated forms that go along with it.

• Decision Making Authority: Discussion

  • Who will own the form once it's all done?

    • DOJ would make the most sense. If they do not want to be the owner, than it will go to the FAC.

• Need supplemental form on incident form to help ease the process

Demo of the DSP Incident Management System

• It was developed based off the paper form

• No drop down lists, no consistency in data input

• They don't have a map section and it only handles one vehicle (not multiple vehicles)

• They use this for non-arrest stuff such as provided assistance to the Golf Tournament, etc

• Having a statewide standard form would be amazing

• May continue to use, but only for non-arrest items.

What is an incident?

What is the process for entering an incident? How do you handle Arrests, Evidence, Property, Vehicles?

• Tim--like alcohol form, like current arrest, jail booking form.

  • Incorporate call for service and citizen contact form.

  • One form that can be expanded to do multiple functions

  • Should be able to tag the name as:

    • Victim

    • Reporter

    • Suspect

  • Location is an important item to capture.

• Dan-- What is an incident exactly? Special event still need a narrative.

  • Toggle reportable/non reportable

  • No validation rules, just go straight to narrative.

  • Could be used for other types of incidents: lost cat, other items.

• Bryan-- warrant arrest and select other forms

  • Arrest

  • Incident

  • Agency field for non-reportable.

    • 24 hour report

    • Civil incident

    • Human trafficking - this is a big new one

  • Field for transmitting to different locations

  • Burglary

    • Officer narrative

    • General information

    • Property

    • Case management

    • Word documents sometimes

• Shawn

  • Jail booking on word document

  • Routing list for transmission

  • Mail run or property check/ run incident reports.

• Brenda

  • Deadline :

  • We have to realistic with what we can deliver in a certain time

    • UCR start with getting agencies compliant with 2021 dead line.

  • Later

    • What needs for DA

    • What needs for RMS

• Try to create roadmap for the future

What outputs do you want?

• This may help identify what data elements we need. (Submit IBR data to DOJ/Feds--Evidence report?)

  • eReferral to DAIT

  • IBR

  • Probation/parole

  • Drugs/prescriptions

  • Overdose requirements (Hyda OD map)

  • Cleary – report of specific crimes

    • Similar the UCR

  • Human trafficking

  • Local drug unit

  • Native American drug

  • SAR (Suspicious Activity Reporting)

  • Child Protection Services

Who for:

• Officer

• Offense

  • Citation

  • Statute number

• Mapping by location

  • Multiple locations 6 different locations.

• Vehicle

• Very good narrative section.

Ownership of form:

• Still need to have the ability to open someone else's reports.

• Still need to be able to transfer ownership of form between users.

Arrest means:

• Non custody booking form

• Different than suspect arrested with charge

• Booked and finger printed

• Referred did they get an atn tracking number

Property index.

Logging discussion:

• Would like to see logging of all field changes. (B. Hasse)

• Need to define a place / time to start the logging.

  • Citations log field changes after the citation is issued.

Decision:

• Start with Iowa form

  • They might have the ATN--Arrest Trans Booking No.

    • Remove this field

Discuss dates for the next meetings and meeting locations:

• Tomah Academy ?

• Stevens Point UW in August

• Tues Wed Thurs

• Not August 14th -16

• Last week Tues 20th

Action Items:

• DSP to create the Incident SharePoint site

• ALL: Review IOWA forms and make suggestions for WI customization.

Agenda - August 20, 2019

Wednesday, August 07, 2019

11:15 AM

TraCS Incident Form Work Group Agenda

UW Stevens Point - Chemistry Biology Building - Room 109

2101 4th Ave, Stevens Point

August 20, 2019 – 9:00 – 3:00 PM

9:00 Introductions

9:10 Review last meeting notes

9:20 Finalize Charter

9:30 Review Mocked up 'basic federal requirements' form

10:30 Break

10:45 Continue review of Mocked up form

12:15 Lunch on your own

1:00 Review of data elements:

• State and/or Federal requirements

• Agency requirements

2:45 Discuss dates for the next meetings and meeting locations

FINAL Notes - August 20, 2019

Monday, August 19, 2019

2:52 PM

Dan Heimann and Shawn McGee

• Added "and identify other associated forms" in purpose from the last meeting

• Very general and good open statement

• Committee Sponsors

  • Both have left state service

  • Should we leave them listed and update when replacements are known?

    • Yes for now, review at next meeting.

• Approved as presented.

• Looking at what fields should be included or removed.

• Geri explained the color coding of the form

• Document.Status is not the approval status

  • Can form disposition and form status be linked?

    • Would need to have validation rules created.

  • Iowa uses the Accept History field to track approval

  • Change field name of 'Status' to 'Form Disposition'

    • Field label may be removed for form consistency

    • This field LE officers will not fill out this field. It is filled out based on how the field is filled out and the program assigns the 'disposition'

    • Dan feels the Supervisor can decide if the case is active vs non-active

  • Some discussion of having Supervisor status to change this field.

• Will also be a log file associated for each form

• Case Management will require additional discussion for tracking status of the incident.

• Report Type

• 'Transmission To' field

  • Is this wanted?

    • Group decided to keep this field

  • Transmissions:

    • DOJ

    • DA Protect

    • Muni Court

    • Other destinations can be added in future

    • Also, State Patrol has some email notifications when drug related charges are issued.

    • SARS

    • RMS

  • Would like to have some validation that flags this for other reports that need to be completed.

• Reportable?

  • Non Reportable would not have validation rules run.

  • May need to define what is "Reportable"

  • Non Reportable could be used for internal tracking.

  • Officer should not be able to check this field. Based on the 'incident type' should determine if it is reportable or not.

    • List of Report Types should dictate the selection of this field.

    • This could be agency specific as well.

  • Change the 'Reportable' to 'Internal Report'

    • If yes, then have an agency field with their agency defined table with all their different issues.

• Date Time Known?

  • Right now it is all or nothing. If you don't know one, then the answer is No.

  • DOJ has a date known field.

    • If No, then they use the Report Date

    • If Yes, then add the date

  • DOJ time fields are not always accurate

    • 00:00 is midnight, but officers use it for unknown

    • If date is known, must have an incident time.

  • Need to Split Date/Time into 2 separate fields

    • When Date or time is known, then grey out the range fields.

    • LE wants to keep both date and time range fields when unknown.

      • DOJ will still get Report Date if Incident Date is unknown

• Cleared Exceptionally

  • T and W are not choices in Wisconsin

• Date Cleared Exceptionally

  • Leave disabled, but add date when Cleared Exceptionally field is entered.

• No of Stolen Vehicles and Number of Recovered Vehicles

  • Derived fields

    • Group would like to remove these from this location as it is already in the property group.

    • Removal of these is Deferred to FAC

• Need to add a Cargo Theft field

  • This is a new FBI requirement

• Would like a report of what is sent to DOJ

  • Like a transmission receipt

  • Need some warnings for stolen vehicle to be sure they are not missed.

• Remove Incident Reported By Victim field.

• Incident Reported by sub-group

  • Reported by table should be modified

    • Change 1 to Law Enforcement

    • Remove Officer

    • Add Anonymous

    • Add Confidential

    • Add Self

• Reporting Victim's Sequence Number

  • This will be autogenerated and filled in.

• Would like to have more warnings than errors.

  • DOJ required fields would have errors.

• Common Information section Individual

  • Company Name field

    • Could this be associated for "Mandatory Reporter"

    • Acting as an agent for a school, etc.

    • Do not have personal information added, just business info.

    • Should be enabled at all times

      • Non Individual entity should also have name fields enabled

        • Individual information would not be enabled.

    • Should function like the Property Owner Group

  • Add Work Phone #

  • Add email address

• Statute Sequence number is required by DA\Courts

• Lessor Offenses can be removed from the form.

• Have the ability for 10 offenses reported

• DOJ treats all offenses the same, no lessor offenses.

• Is there a need to document Traffic Violations cited as well?

  • The DA may want the information

  • Some DA's may not.

• Attempted Completed

  • Remove Ongoing and Threat of Force from the table

• Can the Citation Number be replicated into this form

  • Will need to add Citation Number to the group.

• Bias Motivation

  • How hate crimes are tracked.

  • Need to verify the table contains all attributes needed for Wisconsin

  • Could default to either None or Unknown

    • FBI considers Unknown as something probably happened, just not sure

  • There is no data received from the courts

  • Is there a need for Other with the ability to free key in response

    • If used, DOJ would send a None to FBI

    • Group would like this.

    • Should be some review at a later date to see if some items should be added to the list,

  • This should be a multiselect field.

• Criminal Activity

  • Looks like the animal cruelty attributes are missing from the table.

• Weapon

  • Combination of Weapon and Automatic Weapon

  • Should be a multiselect field if it isn't already

• Suspected of Using

  • Suspected of Using while committing the crime

• Method of Entry

  • Two Options only

  • Deals with Burglary

  • Need validation to check Offense vs here. (must have burglary as on offense for it to show here)

• Gang Information (up to 2)

  • Rename this to Gang Activity

  • This is a NIBRS field

  • Reconcile the Iowa and citizen contact tables.

    • Agency level table

  • Should be in any individual group

  • Could be triggered by Offense codes

• Standard group

  • Contains both DNR and DOT information

• Location Type

  • Has dropdown table

• Does DOJ need to have a physical address for each incident.

• Can have up to 10 property details

• Can have up to 10 vehicles

• Can have up to 3 drugs

  • If the over 3 types is selected

    • Send that code to DOJ

    • Allow additional drugs to be added

  • Would like to have ability of 99 drugs.

    • More than that there should be a supplemental report

    • Decided to go with 25 to start.

    • Need more discussion at later date for number to start as we test.

• Loss Type

  • List adjusts to the offense code added.

• Property Descriptions

• Property Value

  • Dollar value

• Recovery Date

• Associated Offense Sequence Number

  • Autogenerated

• Property Details

  • Currently set at 200 characters

  • Would be beneficial to have this field

  • It would be an optional field

  • Remove this field as it is redundant with Property Description in Property Details group

• Number of Stolen Motor Vehicle

• Number of Recovered Motor Vehicle

  • Do LE usually complete both a stolen and recovered on separate forms?

  • Can you replicate this when you recover?

  • Some have to do 2 forms as the recovery value may not match property value.

  • When recovered vehicle is found, the recovery goes back to originating agency to update the record.

  • Should an Originating Agency field be added?

    • Helpful to remind agency to contact originating agency.

    • No.

• Change to question: Is the recovered vehicle stolen in your jurisdiction?

  • If No, then contact the originating agency

• Recovered Type

  • Should have agency name of the recovering agency.

    • Could have changes to the table

      • Geri made updates to the table

• Drugs

  • Drug Type

    • NIBRS list

  • Drug Quantity

  • Measure

• Property Details

  • Property Description

    • Need this here for master index inclusion

  • Quantity

  • SIN#

    • Rename to OAN#

      • Owner Applied Number should be the label

• Vehicle group

  • Group would like to have vehicle type added.

  • Remove Associated Offense Sequence No as it is in Property group already.

  • Need to add ORI # field for out of state agencies that recovered property.

    • Would use violation search engine to find Wisconsin agencies.

• Victim Type

  • Choice will drive what fields are enabled and disabled.

• DOB Known

  • Iowa added DOB known with age range

• E-Mail address

  • Nice to have, but should be optional

  • Rename to primary e-mail address

• Alias

  • Free key

• Skin Tone

  • Drop down list

  • Discussion

    • This is too subjective to interpretation

  • Group votes to remove this field.

• Scars, Marks, Tattoos

  • Free Key

• Add Gang Association field

Keep this section

Keep this section

DOJ to review and update all tables

• Aggravated Assault/Homicide Circumstances (up to 2)

  • Describes the homicide

• Additional Justifiable Homicide Circumstances

  • Only available when there is a justifiable homicide

Need to change field labels

Remove the Not Applicable, Bia crime, Domestic Abuse, LEOKA section

Remove this entire group

• Remove this section

• Children Present

• Sequence Number of the Domestic Abuse Offender

• Domestic Abuse Referrals ( up to 6)

• Officer Killed or Assaulted

  • Remove this field

• Call Type

  • Will verify table entries are what Wisconsin needs

• Type of Assignment

• Body Armor

  • Remove this field

• Agency Name

  • May need to have ORI number for officer from another agency

  • Rename to Agency Name – Other Jurisdiction

  • Need to have a very good F2 Help

  • Currently the FBI will reject and error out an out of state ORI

• Individual Type

• Arrested?

  • Keep this field

• Want to have SSN number added

  • This will be an optional field

• Offender Present When Officer Arrived?

  • Remove this field

• Add Gang information

• Type of Injury

  • Is this during or after incident?

  • Rename to "Apparent Injury Observed?"

  • Group voted to remove this field

• Type of Offender

  • Remove

• Lessor Offense Sequence Numbers

  • Remove this field

• Skin Tone

  • Remove this field

• Arrest Transaction Booking #

  • DOJ would like to keep this

• Type of Arrest

  • NIBRS

• Place of Birth

  • Remove this field

• State ID #

• Miranda By

  • Remove this field

• Miranda Date

  • Remove this field

• Associated Offense Sequence Number

  • Need a charge field as well

• Could rename to Witness / Involvement

• Can change the Witness Type field

• Future Discussion Items:

  • Document Group

    • How to transmit the form (multiple times, etc.)

    • Report Type - decide later 

  • Tables

    • After DOJ updates for Wisconsin, they should be reviewed by the workgroup for additions that could be added

  • Discuss the Arrested Section auto-populating from other forms.

    • Additional fields from Incident should be on Arrest Form

      • Arrestee Condition and other field

• Start reviewing form at Parent / Guardian group

• October week of the 21^st

  • Possible 22^nd or 24^th

• Location

  • Madison?

Agenda - October 22, 2019

Wednesday, August 07, 2019

11:15 AM

TraCS Incident Form Work Group Agenda

DSP De Forest Post – Large Conference Room

October 22, 2019 at 9:00 – 3:00 PM

9:00 Introductions

9:10 Review last meeting notes

9:20 Continue review mocked up 'basic federal requirements' form

10:00 Break

10:15 Go over the entry form flow that the TraCS Forms Advisory (FAC) Committee created.

Discuss some questions that came from the FAC Meeting

11:15: Form Mechanics (workflow of form)

• Follow DOJ Incident Training Book (black book)?

• Involvement (parent, reported by, witness) Type Table

  • Mechanic Field for the group

• Exports/Output Prioritizations

  • Prioritize (list of exports from June Notes)

  • Review Requirements (assign to others)

12:00 Lunch on your own

12:45 Continue Form Mechanics

1:00 Discuss the associated forms to the Incident Form

• How would they work together (Replicate/auto populate)

• Discuss phased in approach.

2:00 Review of data elements:

• How should we review?

  • Sub group/committee

  • Assign homework

• State and/or Federal requirements

• Agency requirements

Additional items:

Add 'Near UW Campus' field to form - this will assist with the Cleary Act

FINAL Notes - October 22, 2019

Wednesday, August 07, 2019

11:15 AM

TraCS Incident Form Work Group Agenda

DSP De Forest Post – Large Conference Room

October 22, 2019 at 9:00 – 3:00 PM

Work Group Team / Attendees:  

9:00 Introductions

9:10 Review last meeting notes

Resent the SharePoint site to all attendees

9:20 Continue review mocked up 'basic federal requirements' form

• Description Group

  • Photos By - keep - Move to Summary Group

  • Photos - Y/N - keep - Move to Summary Group

  • Additional Information - rename to 'Video' - Move to Summary Group

    • An agency field for them to add their own list.

    • Need to have None in the field

  • Narrative (Incident narrative)

    • Have something separated out (Bryan/Travis)

      • A secondary narrative that does go to public (the Report Summary for Public Release)

  • Complainant/Reporting Party (Signature) - Remove this field

  • Supervisor - Remove this field

  • Badge Number - Remove this field

  • Evidence Seizure Y/N - Move to Summary Group (in future trigger Evidence form)

  • For Public Release Y/N - Remove this field

  • Incident Assigned To - Remove this field

  • Report Summary for Public Release - Keep

10:00 Break

10:15 Go over the entry form flow that the TraCS Forms Advisory (FAC) Committee created.

• Discuss some questions that came from the FAC Meeting

  • Summary group changes:

    • They reordered the groups to: summary, violation, Subject, victim

    • They combined the Witness and involvement groups

    • They decided to put the # of stolen motor vehicles and # of recovered motor vehicles to the Property Group

  • Violation/Offense Group:

    • Does every offense need a new location or just one location for the incident?

      • DOJ would like to know the original location where the crime occurred.

    • Can there be multiple locations with the TLT?

      • Decided that only needs the original incident location.

      • Other locations will be listed in the narrative.

  • Individual/Offender/Subject Group

    • What do you want to call this group? (Individual will be on the back end, UFD uses subject on the front end)

      • Use Subject Group

      • Removed Parent Group and combined it into the Witness/Involvement Group

      • What should be the total number for this group, FAC wanted to reduce the amount because in reality 99 will cause issues with speed?

        • Group decided on 20 max. Need to add (20 Max) to data bar and field names.

  • Victim Group

    • What should be the total number for this group, FAC wanted to reduce the amount because in reality 99 will cause issues with speed?

      • Group decided on 20 max. Want to be consistent with all groups. (May want to put '20 Max' in the data bar / field name)

  • Involvement Group

    • Combined group with links to other groups. (Combined reported by, parent, witness)

      • What should be the total number for this group?

        • Be consistent and go with 20 max.

      • Add fields to make it work with parent linking and reported by

        • Need to link who they are the parent of?

        • Like if they are a victim/subject reporting themselves

    • Is there a better name for this group?

      • Ask FAC

  • Property Group

    • # of stolen Motor Vehicles and # of Recovered Motor Vehicles was added

  • Some concern on how to get supplemental reports to the primary agency

11:15: Form Mechanics (workflow of form)

• Follow DOJ Incident Training Book (black book)?

• Fields:

  • Rename Internal Report to WIBRS Reportable

    • Default to Yes when a statute needs to be sent to DOJ.

    • Be able to have supervisor change this upon review.

    • DOJ to make the determination if it is Reportable or not

      • Agencies will send all reports to DOJ

    • We can check for completeness before allowing the status to change to accepted before allowing transmission.

    • TraCS can check for statutes that need to be sent to DOJ and change to reportable and send.

      • Gray out the field, TraCS will populate during validation.

• Involvement (parent, reported by, witness) Type Table

  • Mechanic Field for the group

• Exports/Output Prioritizations

  • Prioritize (list of exports from June Notes)

    • eReferral to DAIT (1)

    • IBR (2)

    • Probation/parole - DOC - Travis

    • Human trafficking - DOJ ICAC- Tim Strohbusch

    • SAR (Suspicious Activity Reporting) DOJ WISC - Derek Veitenheimer

    • Child Protection Services - County by County - most likely a PDF of the entire report

    • Drugs/prescriptions - Travis

    • Overdose requirements (HIDTA OD map) - Travis

    • Local drug unit (county based most likely not an automatic transmission) email.

    • Cleary – report of specific crimes. Similar the UCR. Field triggered off of offense, not an automatic transmission. DOJ thinks this may be redefined in the near future. - Derek, Jeni - UWSP PD

• Review Requirements (assign to others)

• Statute Table -

• NTC printed forms - Want to ask FAC if they want to add the DA Routing code to the printed copy. Town of Beloit

• Would like to be able to Amend submitted reports

  • Possibly replicate to an amend

• Workflow scenerios

  • 1 report by 1 officer

    • Standard procedure

  • 1 report with additional officers responding

    • Assign a principle officer to complete the form

    • Additional officers would complete supplemental forms

    • May need to add Additional Agency group with their case numbers

    • Additional officers could also email a PDF copy of their reports to the principle officer to be included as attachments.

• Supplemental and Amended Reports

  • Definitely a need for both

  • Supplemental - add information to the case

  • Amendment - changes the original report

  • Amended Reports received by DOJ currently deletes the stored record and replaces it with the new record.

• Supplemental form design options

  • Option 1 - Person group and Narrative Group

  • Option 2 - Full form with the ability to enable\disable groups as needed.

12:00 Lunch on your own

12:45 Continue Form Mechanics

• Assumptions:

  • Primary officer will own the form and can make amendments.

  • Secondary officers will only submit supplemental reports

• Question for Brenda Ray

  • Can eRefferal handle changes (amends) and attachments.

• Additional Workflow questions

  • Who can see what forms?

  • Who can change the original?

  • How is the original changed?

    • Amendment

    • Supplemental

1:00 Discuss the associated forms to the Incident Form

• What Forms should be included:

  • Have 1 form that does all the data collection

  • Be able to select what forms you want to print

  • Should function like the alcohol suite of forms.

• Arrest Form (fifth)

  • Keep as separate form that can be replicated into/from Incident

  • Use that current form in TraCS

    • May want to review what fields need to be included

  • Implement this at a later date.

• Evidence Form (fourth form)

  • Review of Iowa form

  • One form per piece of evidence

  • Will want to be able to 'add new' or replicate forms

  • Has its own master index (iowa)

  • Will need to work on mechanics and validations.

  • Location types wanted:

    • Incident location

    • Where was the evidence gathered

      • Not TLT, but where the evidence was found/taken

• Supplemental Form

  • Should be the second form worked on after the incident form

• Amended form

  • Should be third form

• How would they work together (Replicate/auto populate)

• Discussion of phased in approach.

  • Should this be a 2 year project?

    • No

  • We should set a deadline for next fall, but be flexible.

  • Start with Incident Report

  • Discussed the possibility of releasing a BETA version in the fall 2020

    • Let agencies use and comment

    • We would make changes based on comments with a full release in fall 2021.

2:00 Review of data elements:

• How should we review?

  • Sub group/committee

    • Should meet in person

    • Can Skype in as well

    • Only need one developer to attend.

  • Meet every two weeks.

    • November 5th and 20th here in DeForest

  • Assign homework

    • Not recommended

• State and/or Federal requirements

• Agency requirements

2:45 Discuss dates for the next meetings and meeting locations

• Sub-committee (Shawn, Travis, Bryan, Tim and Dan)

  • November 5th and 20th here in DeForest

• Full Committee

  • December 12th. Eau Claire area. Louis Yetter will try to set something up.

  • December 17th backup date

Additional items:

• Add 'Near UW Campus' field to form - this will assist with the Cleary Act

  • DECISION: Each person/officer has their own interpretation of 'near' so the decision was made not to add this field at this time.

• Place of last drink

  • Used for educating local establishment

  • Alcohol suite might be a better place for a field like this.

  • Or possibly the upcoming arrest form revision?

  • DECISION: The decision was made not to add to this form.

Agenda - December 2019

Monday, October 28, 2019

3:28 PM

TraCS Incident Form Work Group Agenda

Fort McCoy Base - Wisconsin State Patrol Academy

Class Room 1

December 12, 2019 from 9:00 – 3:00 PM

9:00 Introductions

9:05 Review last meetings notes

9:10 Update on Assignments from Last meeting

• Reviewing Data Elements Sub Committee

• Data Transmission Partners

  • eReferral to DAIT (Brenda)

  • IBR (DOJ - Derek)

  • Probation/parole - (DOC - Travis)

  • Human trafficking - DOJ ICAC (Tim Strohbusch)

    • I spoke with Matt Joy from DCI- ICAC and Human Trafficking.

    • They receive information through a number of sources, but there is not an "electronic" source in the way we are looking at it.  The receive most of their information in a PDF email format.

  • SAR (Suspicious Activity Reporting) (DOJ WISC - Derek Veitenheimer)

  • Child Protection Services - County by County - most likely a PDF of the entire report

  • Drugs/prescriptions - (DSPS - Travis)

  • Overdose requirements (HIDTA OD map - Travis)

  • Local drug unit (county based most likely not an automatic transmission) email.

  • Cleary – report of specific crimes. Similar the UCR. Field triggered off of offense, not an automatic transmission. (DOJ thinks this may be redefined in the near future. - Derek, Jeni - UWSP PD)

10:00 Printed Reports

• Types

  • Office

  • Redacted

  • Court/Public Copy

10:20 Analysis Reports

• What is needed/wanted?

  • Cleary Report looking for the check box.

  • Monthly/ Yearly Statistics

    • Sample from Sparta

    • Town of beloit

  • What they sent to DOJ Listings of incidents

    • Work with DOJ

  • Incident By officer

10:40 Break

10:55 Demo

• Questions for group:

  • Can the property group open for a non-reportable form? It is currently tied to open if a property offense is chosen.

  • Rename Other Person to Other Person\Entity?

  • Reasoning if listed is a non individual

  • Move Prescriber Name and Prescription Number below DOB Line of data

  • Rename Organization Type to Person\Entity Type

  • Rename Government to Government\School ( Not all schools are government run )

  • Move Linked Person to Parent of Line of data (should this open for all types to link to subject victim)

  • Rename Linked Person to Linked Subject/Victim ( available for every involvement type )

  • Victim Type of Other and Unknown, how should I enable/disable fields

  • Victim Type of Law Enforcement for DOJ only opens for certain offenses. (assaulted/killed) Do we want that group enabled for everything?

  • Is the subject type always Individual?

  • Subject Group--Change field name from Individual Type to Entity Type – Data Bar should be  Individual/Organization Entity Type 

  • Move Prescription Violation Flag field to Prescription section.  Move Narcan Administered to middle then Prescription Violation to the end of that row. (Also should it be its own subgroup like the arrest subgroup?)

  • Missing Gang Affiliation for Subject / Victim / Other Person ?  Thought we had discussed adding Gang Affiliation to incorporate list of gang if individual is member of  or affiliated with a gang? Currently this is in the violation group.

  • Should Drugs/Narcotics Type have a prescription number field ???

12:00 Lunch

12:45 Demo (continued)

1:30 Project Timeline

• Testing Process

• Test Scenarios (Create)

2:15 Icon discussion/F2 Help

2:55 Next Meeting in Deforest - When?

FINAL Notes - December 12, 2019

Thursday, December 12, 2019

9:08 AM

Fort McCoy - State Patrol Academy

Classroom 1

December 12, 2019 at 9:00 – 3:00 PM

Work Group Team / Attendees:  

Introduction of members.

• Reviewed last meeting notes

  • There are still some people who cannot get into SharePoint

  • TraCS staff will send out meeting notes in a PDF along with updating SharePoint

• Update on Assignments from Last meeting

  • Reviewing Data Elements Sub Committee

1. Violation Group

   1. V2WIBRSOffense*

      1. Keep Runaway

      2. Delete drunkenness

   2. V2WIBRSCompletedAttempted

   3. V2WIBRSUsing

   4. V2WIBRSBiasMotivation

      1. Delete Gender

      2. Add Anti-Profession

      3. Keep Anti-Age

      4. Keep Anti-Political Affiliation

   5. V2WIBRSCriminalActivity

   6. V2WIBRSEntryMethod

   7. V2WIBRSGangActivity

      1. Remove Table found in Criminal Activities

      2. V2WIBRSGangActivity

         1. Remove Table found in Criminal Activities

      3.  

      4. V2WIBRSModifier

         1. Talk to Brenda, multiple??

      5. V2WIBRSWeapon

         1. Delete BB/Pellet Gun

      6. Add field for Weapon Other choice

      7. V3ViolationNonTraffic**

2. Other Person Group

   1. V2InvolvementType

   2. V2ReportedBy

3. Property

   1. V2WIBRSLoss

   2. V2WIBRSPropertyTitle

   3. V2WIBRSProperty

      1. Change to violation search

4. Drug

   1. V2WIBRSDrug

   2. V2WIBRSMeasure

5. Vehicle

   1. V2VehicleRecoveryType

6. Location

   1. V2Location

7. Summary

   1. V3SupplementalDocuments

      1. Use Crash Table

   2. V2WIBRSClearedExceptionally

8. Individual/Subject/Victim

   1. V2Age

   2. V2Residency--Need Table Added.

   3. V2DOJEthnicity

9. Arrest

   1. V2WIBRSArmed

   2. V2ArrestJuviDisposition

   3. V2ArrestMultipleIndicator

   4. V2ArrestType

   5. ADD TABLE V2WIBRSARRESTARMEDWITH

10. Victim

    1. V2WIBRSJustifiableHomicideCircumstances

    2. V2WIBRSAggAssaultHomicideCircumstances

    3. V2EntityTypeExpanded

    4. V2WIBRSInjuryType

11. Offender Relationship

    1. V2WIBRSVictimRelationship

12. LEA

    1. V2WIBRSAssignmentType

    2. V2WIBRSCallType

13. All individual groups

    1. Add Agency Gang Table

Comments

1. Is there any need for 'Place of Last Drink' field?

   1. This could be an optional field.

   2. How good would this information really be?

      1. Comes from the inebriated subject

   3. This would be a better fit for the influence form as it is already there.

      1. Just needs to add transmission on the influence form to send POLD

Data Transmission Partners

1. eReferral to DAIT (Brenda)

   1. Is there one location where the data can be sent to?

      1. Create a webservice where TraCS and eReferal can send Incident forms and other incident related info.

      2. Will need to have a separate meeting to work out the details

         1. Should schedule for some time in January.

      3. DAIT has a test site available and Brenda will send the link.

2. IBR (DOJ - Derek)

   1. They would like to have all data fields.

   2. DOJ will parse out and store what is needed for fed reporting.

3. Probation/parole - (DOC - Travis)

   1. Made contact and waiting on response.

4. Human trafficking - DOJ ICAC (Tim Strohbusch)

   1. Tim spoke with Matt Joy from DCI- ICAC and Human Trafficking.

   2. They receive information through a number of sources, but there is not an "electronic" source in the way we are looking at it.  They receive most of their information in a PDF email format.

   3. Derek thinks that they should be able to parse out what is needed here since they will be receiving all of the data.

5. SAR (Suspicious Activity Reporting) (DOJ WISC - Derek Veitenheimer)

   1. Derek thinks that they should be able to parse out what is needed here since they will be receiving all of the data.

   2. May be a setup like eCitation webservice where it would send out the data to all DOJ locations.

   3. Better to have a single transmission than multiple one.

6. Child Protection Services - County by County - most likely a PDF of the entire report

7. Drugs/prescriptions - (DSPS - Travis)

   1. Had a meeting with them.

   2. Willing to have a webservice to accept XML data.

   3. Gave us a list of fields they need and these have been incorporated into the incident form.

8. Overdose requirements (HIDTA OD map - Travis)

   1. Has made contact.

   2. There is a conference call going on today.

      1. DOJ has a representative on the call.

9. Local drug unit (county based most likely not an automatic transmission) email.

10. Cleary – report of specific crimes. Similar to the UCR. Field triggered off of offense, not an automatic transmission. (DOJ thinks this may be redefined in the near future. - Derek, Jeni - UWSP PD)

    1. Data usually comes directly from the university police.

    2. University police work with surrounding agencies within the university jurisdiction

    3. There may only need to have a Cleary check box if it meets criteria.

       1. Would like to have a drop down list of the crimes.

       2. Would like to have an analysis report created.

    4. All paper submission now.

    5. Not all crimes are reported to a police department

       1. Dean of Students could also be the one reported to.

    6. Reporting is very complicated as it stands now.

Printed Reports

• Types

  • Office ?

    • Same order as the entry form

• Redacted ?

  • Is one needed?

  • Yes, with open records requests.

  • Can it be redacted in the narrative?

    • Working on this now.

    • Uses the { } brackets to replace information when printed.

    • Would like to be able to edit the narrative to add the {} even after transmission for office staff.

    • Would have to reprogram the forms to allow for narrative to be editable?

    • Can we create a new narrative group ( a copy of the original) that could be edited for redaction?

• Public Copy ?(Court Copy)

  • Could be any combination of data.

  • Should contain only what is sent to eReferal.

  • Some questioned why there should be more than type of report.

    • Don't want to have DA and public to have a different report.

• Other

• Comments

  • Need to have the ability to track changes to the form.

  • Are the narratives getting to ereferral included?

    • There are two narratives planned on the form.

      • Officer and Public release

  • DAIT can take attachments up to 10 MB each.

  • Could TraCS enforce a 10 MB limit?

• What is needed/wanted?

  • Cleary Report looking for the check box.

• Monthly and Yearly summary of crimes.

  • Booker to send samples of their reports

  • By officer by month.

    • Bryan Hasse has sample reports

  • Comparative report of what was sent to DOJ

  • Incidents with incident number

  • By category i.e Felony, Misdemeanor, Etc.

    • Need to add category into the form as autopopulate from table.

• Geri reviewed the form (as much that has been completed).

  • Not all validations are done,.

  • Worked mostly on form mechanics.

    • How should groups be opened

      • Autoopen as one is completed.

      • Total Group

        • Enter the number of groups needed.

• Summary Group

  • Adds Date and time when form is opened.

  • If Date and Time is known field opens date and time fields.

  • How are unknown time handled?

    • Time range would be 00:001 to 23:59

    • Dates would be handled the same way.

  • After DA declines to prosecute, LE needs to be able to go back into the form and change the Cleared Exceptionally field.

  • Prescription alert field

    • Triggers a transmission type.

• Location Group

  • TLT contains both DOT and DNR County and Municipality codes.

• Offense group

  • Statute number is filled in, then another violation group, up to 10 total.

    • Empty group will not affect validation rules

  • DNR will need to add offense codes to their statutes.

  • Do not have to have a statute listed

    • Most agencies would list it anyways,

    • eReferral does need a statute.

  • TraCS has difficulty in doing one to many relationship to statutes to offense codes.

    • A single statute may have multiple offense codes attached to it.

      • Need to figure out a way to make this happen.

    • For statutes with multiple offense codes, could we leave the Offense field blank and have the offense code in a drop down list for someone else to answer.

    • For the validation rule error message, need to be able to add the necessary answers in the message.

    • Need to find a way to create a list of offense codes tied to statutes for whoever is filling out the form.

    • When 1 to 1, fill in the offense field.

      • Could go to Preliminary Validation to be sent to DA's

      • Then could go back and finalize later.

    • When 1 to many, leave offense field blank, present as a warning and program it so it can be completed at a later date.

      • Need to look into a way to have the offense field be able to present the 1 to many codes.

    • There are 11,100 statutes with offense codes.

  • Prescription Statute

    • Need to add schedule to table

  • Property Offense

    • If Yes, then opens property group

  • Additional fields to add:

    • Agency specific field (Travis) (Internal agency checkbox)

      • Agency Category

      • Agency Sub Category

    • Gang Activity is improperly listed in this group.

      • Needs to be in individual group.

• Subject group

  • Need to allow for Business as the individual type.

  • Arrest field

    • What does this mean?

    • Were they fingerprinted and have an arrest tracking number.

    • eReferal

      • Booked

    • NIBRS

      • ?

  • ATN Number is hard to get.

    • A lot of legwork is required.

  • Add a Booking subgroup

    • Date, Time, ATN and agency Booking ORI

    • All fields would be optional and transmit if they are there,

    • Can TraCS generate an ATN number?

      • Brenda will gather more information and report back.

  • Prescription

    • Group decided to have them appear when a check box is used.

    • Need to add the check box

    • Make this a subgroup.

  • UCR offense (Multiple)

    • It is needed for eReferral though

    • Need to review the "Acting in Concert" rule (DOJ)

      • DOJ to review how to receive it all and break down to the separate incidents when needed.

• Victim

  • UCR offense

    • Should this include Ordinance number?

      • Yes, include them.

    • Commas are OK for separators

  • Date of Birth

    • When entered, the age is calculated and fields are disabled.

    • If not entered, then the lower and upper end fields are enabled.

  • Injury field opens with injury offense is selected.

  • Victim relationship to offender(s)

    • All violent and property crimes when victim type is individual or Law Enforcement, then the offenders need relationships.

    • Change defendant to Subject in this group.

• Other Person / Entity

  • Reported by

    • How does the crime Stopper or another tip number be tracked.

    • If Crime Stopper Tip then use the Other button to list that.

• Property Group

  • 3 types Drugs, Vehicle, Other

  • DOJ will try to relax some of the validation rules about what can be sent.

    • Will take all data but only send FBI what is needed.

  • Only Property offenses show up in the property group.

  • Automobiles

    • Opens up the vehicle group

    • Recovered stolen vehicles recovered by agency ORI is not required.

  • Property

    • Add an Evidence Number field in the parent level of the group

      • A Healthy discussion ensued…

    • Need a good F2 help explanation about what should or should not be included.

      • Officers are used to listing all property / evidence now.

    • DOJ will allow LE to add all property / evidence wanted, but will only send the required data through to FBI.

    • For Unknown value allow 0 or unknown and DOJ will correct it in the back end.

      • $1 is FBI equivalent of unknown.

• Accept History

  • Tracks who and when a form was Accepted.

• As of January 2019, 209 agencies replied to the survey

• 159 agencies are currently using the Influence Form

• 159 agencies are using the Alcohol form

  • Another 22 agencies may use these two forms in the future

• Geri reviewed progress as to where we are.

• Testing Process

  • DSP will try to set up a test lab for agencies to come and test

  • Will be located at DeForest Post

• Test Scenarios (Create)

  • Group can bring scenarios to use while testing

  • Brenda has some to contribute.

DOJ is OK to have a partial release, i.e. eReferral, if they are not ready yet.

• Idea sheet distributed

• Icon should be Blue background

• Group should send suggestions

• Next Meeting in Deforest - When?

  • February in DeForest

    • Week of 17th. Most likely 18, 19, 20.

  • April computer lab somewhere

• Questions for group:

  • Can the property group open for a non-reportable form? It is currently tied to open if a property offense is chosen.

    • Yes, open it.

  • Rename Other Person to Other Person\Entity?

    • Yes

  • Reasoning if listed is a non individual

  • Move Prescriber Name and Prescription Number below DOB Line of data

  • Rename Organization Type to Person\Entity Type

  • Rename Government to Government\School ( Not all schools are government run )

  • Move Linked Person to Parent of Line of data (should this open for all types to link to subject victim)

    • Yes it should be opened.

  • Rename Linked Person to Linked Subject/Victim ( available for every involvement type )

  • Victim Type of Other and Unknown, how should I enable/disable fields

    • Enable all fields, but relax validations for missing entries.

  • Victim Type of Law Enforcement for DOJ only opens for certain offenses. (assaulted/killed) Do we want that group enabled for everything?

    • The group decided - No

  • Is the subject type always Individual?

    • Not always an individual

  • Subject Group--Change field name from Individual Type to Entity Type – Data Bar should be  Individual/Organization Entity Type 

    • Group would like to see this as Subject type

  • Move Prescription Violation Flag field to Prescription section.  Move Narcan Administered to middle then Prescription Violation to the end of that row. (Also should it be its own subgroup like the arrest subgroup?)

  • Missing Gang Affiliation for Subject / Victim / Other Person ?  Thought we had discussed adding Gang Affiliation to incorporate list of gang if individual is member of  or affiliated with a gang? Currently this is in the violation group.

  • Should Drugs/Narcotics Type have a prescription number field ???

    • Group decided: Yes, add it.

      • ID / RX Number (field label)

    • Should be optional

Agenda - February 18, 2020

Wednesday, August 07, 2019

11:15 AM

TraCS Incident Form Work Group Agenda

DSP De Forest Post – Large Conference Room

February 18, 2020 at 9:00 – 3:00 PM

9:00 Introductions

9:10 Review last meeting notes

9:20 How to handle Groups

Should the groups auto open blank groups or should we have Total fields?

10:00 Break

10:15 External Partners

• eReferal

• Probation and Parole --Department of Corrections

• SAR (Suspicious Activity Reporting)

• Human trafficking - DOJ ICAC

• Overdose requirements (HIDTA OD map) -meeting scheduled

• Cleary – report of specific crimes

• Child Protection Services

• Prescription Drug - Done

10:45 DOJ vs DAIT

12:00 Lunch on your own

12:45 DOJ vs DAIT (continued)

2:00 Project Time Line

2:30 Statutes

Traffic vs Felony vs Misdemeanor

2:45 Next Meeting Date

FINAL Notes- February 18, 2020

Wednesday, August 07, 2019

11:15 AM

TraCS Incident Form Work Group Agenda

DSP De Forest Post – Large Conference Room

February 18, 2020 at 9:00 – 3:00 PM

Work Group Team / Attendees:  

Introductions

Review last meeting notes

• Geri went through the previous meeting notes.

• No comments

How to handle groups

• Should the groups auto open blank groups or should we have Total fields.

  • There are 3 ways of doing it

    • Put in the number to open at the top of the group (Total Field)

    • Blue Bars- select add group each time you want to add a group/ delete button to delete group

    • Auto Open, this automatically will open a blank group

• The following use multiple groups

  • Offense (violation) group

    • Have both a box to enter the # of violations/offenses and then also have an add/delete bar and the box will adjust if they are added or deleted

  • Subject group

    • Have both a box to enter the # of violations/offenses and then also have an add/delete bar and the box will adjust if they are added or deleted

  • Victim

    • Have both a box to enter the # of violations/offenses and then also have an add/delete bar and the box will adjust if they are added or deleted

  • Other Person

    • Have both a box to enter the # of violations/offenses and then also have an add/delete bar and the box will adjust if they are added or deleted

  • Property

    • Have a bar for the main property type to add/delete and then they would fill out the main property and it would open the appropriate property type below

      • Drug

      • Vehicle

      • Property Item

    • Have a total for each property group that is grayed out but can list the total Drug, total Vehicle and Total property item

      • Located in the property group

    • It was decided to have a supplement Property Form?

      • This will allow law enforcement to add more than 10 items for any of the 3 categories

      • The 'total' would be pulled from the original form and the supplement to get the total number of a property item

    • In the backend TraCS will need to total like properties and send totals

      • FYI - 4 laptops totaling $3500, would send 1 laptop item with $3500.

    • A flag within property group asking if it is evidence and then pull from evidence form

    • Add an evidence number field (that would be pulled back from the evidence form)

      • One evidence form for each evidence

External Partners

• Probation and Parole

  • Excited about the possibility of

    • Add a 'Probation and Parole Flag' - in subject group

    • They need a 'Report Contact' for each agency

      • Still need to decide where this info. will be capture

    • Add a field for 'Registered Sex Offender Flag' - in subject group

    • Add a field for 'On Supervision'

      • Checked with DOC and they stated that 'Probation and Parole Flag' is the same as 'On Supervision'

    • An individual doesn't always give the correct address, so DOC wants to get that info. also

    • They also want vehicle info. if incident is in a vehicle

      • They want Rental info.

        • Add a field to the vehicle info group, 'Rental Y/N'

    • Suspect Act 33 (This allows persons on parole to call 911 to help another individual without being arrested themselves) - We won't be adding anything

      • We assume that the DA needs to assign this. We won't do anything at this time

    • Gang List

      • Single list - other -

      • It was decided to have a global list instead of a local - we'll get the original list from DOC

      • Add a 'gang' field to 'victim' and 'other persons' groups to make them consistent

    • Tribal member - Table this and discuss later

      • Does anyone want any more info besides the race field?

      • Yes/no flag

      • Kevin, DNR, is going back to check with his staff

      • Kevin emailed and stated DNR doesn't want this info.

    • Have field at the top of the subject group that says 'associated vehicle flag'

      • then it opens up a vehicle group if flag = 'yes'

      • Add a 'rental flag'

    • DOC is currently reviewing Data Dictionary to see what they want

• eReferal

  • Meeting with Brenda Ray

    • Geri has the URL for Dev and Prod

    • DAIT wants the document number for the form to be the incident eReferal number

    • At least one statute number

    • Add 'Officer Witness' to 'other persons' field

1. agencyORINumber

2. documentDocumentNumber -- Will be Agency Case Number within Protect used to link the DA with the Agency

3. summaryDateOccurred -- if law enforcement reports a date range, then they only want the first date entered(from date).

4. violationStatuteNumber -- Need at least 1

5. violationStatuteSequenceNumber -- Required for Statute number

6. violationStatuteDescription -- Code Text

7. violationTotalCount -- New Field--(What is this)

8. violationModifier -- Both Enhancing and Reducing factors. Need number and code text. Removed all duplicates DAIT only needs main number can figure out the rest.

9. locationCountyDMV -- checking with DAIT if need code or text

10. locationMunicipalityDMV -- checking with DAIT if need code or text

11. Optional Address -- if On Street is = Private/Public Property Send in address

12. Individual -- Require one Defendant

• More info. on the eReferral meeting is here

• The ATN is only created when someone is finger printed

• SAR (Suspicious Activity Reporting)

  • Derek will send a contact

    • Milda (DOJ) will look for contact

• Human trafficking - DOJ ICAC

  • Tim Strohbusch contacted them

  • Mathew Joy - Bryan will email his contact to Geri

• Overdose requirements (HIDTA OD map)

  • Meeting scheduled for next week

• Cleary – report of specific crimes

  • Derek, Jeni - UWSP PD

  • Drop Down list of crimes?

• Child Protection Services

  • Need to talk to someone from DHS - Child Protective Services

  • Milda forwarded a contact

• Prescription Drug

  • Met with them - Done

• Evidence Form

  • Add a Rape Kit Flag

    • Add an additional field for a 'tracking number'

• DOJ vs DAIT

  • eReferal based on a location and time

    • DA may take the whole incident or break it up

  • Fundamentally how to identify an incident

    • It differs from eReferal vs law enforcement or FBI (DOJ)

    • FBI defines an incident (DOJ)

      • Acting in Concert

      • Lesser included

      • Group A vs Group B

• Acting in Concert

  • robbed Kwik trip, taco bell, culvers no breakage in time (one after the other), it's one incident

  • If robbed Kwik trip and then had some beers at home and then went and robbed Casey's, they would be two incidents because a breakage of time

  • If Alesha and Derek at Kwik Trip went to rob quick trip, and then Alesha also robbed a vehicle (without Derek's knowledge), they weren't acting in concert, so only Alesha would be charged with the vehicle (Two incidents)

• If the DA splits an incident, the law enforcement doesn't care what the DA does - LEA won't know if the DA split it

• Scenarios:

  • We started going through Acting in Concert scenarios and discussed how law enforcement entered the scenario, how DOJ wanted to see the scenario data sent to them and how DOJ wanted to see the scenario data sent to them

    • Unfortunately, in many cases they were all a little different.

    • The group discussed and understand that law enforcement due to the resource intensive paperwork to complete the forms, complete the incident forms differently than how DOJ would want law enforcement to complete the incident.

      • Law enforcement normally completes the incident form based on an event.

        • IE. Underage house party with drugs and possible other infractions is all recorded as one incident on one form

        • DOJ would like them split up based on the infractions

    • DOJ and TraCS will be continuing discussions to see what the best way is to enter the info. that will satisfy everyone.

    • Main objectives:

      • Make it easy for law enforcement to enter the case

      • Between TraCS and DOJ, they may need to compile, or separate data to make it work for DOJ

      • Make sure it can be sent to DAIT

  • Acting in Concert

    • Scenario #1 - 3 teenagers smoking pot together

      • DOJ - 1 incident because they are all partaking in it.

        • (If one individual didn't know that another kid had cocaine in their pocket, this would be two incidents. One with all three kids and pot and then an additional incident for the one kid and cocaine.)

      • DAIT - 1 incident

    • Another Example: If there is a house party underage drinking - law enforcement would report as 1 incident

      • DOJ wants it broken into multiple offenses depending if there are drugs or other issues

        • How can we find a way to make it easier for LE to report the incidents that won't take them hours and hours. We need to find a compromise between what LEA fills out vs what DOJ needs

    • Another Example: Car thefts throughout the night ( don't know when or who did it) - LE writes them separately and then later find a suspect and add him to each incident and now there are 5 or X counts of vehicle theft .

      • They will be tied together in the narrative that they are hooked together.

      • (For Open Records, LEA doesn't want to give victim info. to others. Having individual incidents is easier --less to redact.

      • The DA will tie them together into 1.

    • Scenario #3 - Mark and Thomas (age 20) both hitting on a woman, Mark gets drunk and passes out downstairs. Thomas goes upstairs and rapes the woman.

      • DOJ - split (Mark with a rape / Mark and Thomas liquor law violation)

      • LE would include all in one

        • In Spillman - they include the relationships between the victim, and subject and other victims

      • If DOJ received all the info., then they would need to know each subject and what each of their offenses was and their relationships to all the other victims and subjects

        • IF things came as one offense, then they need to report to FBI as two - they need to go through all the fields to see what info. they would need to pull in.

    • Scenario #6 - Maggie and Gina are both beating up Jasmine. Maggie breaks nose, but Gina didn't break any bones.

      • DOJ - 1 incident because they are both working in concert

      • DAIT - We think they would want 1

  • Need to understand how an arrest is cleared

  • The plan is to release the incident form with eReferal (hopefully) this fall and allow law enforcement an easy way to enter the incident and define everything that happened at the incident.

    • Derek will give all agencies that plan to use the TraCS Incident form a waiver to meet FBI requirements.

  • Booker stated that his office staff has issues with what charge to send. They need to go in and fix it. Time consuming.

  • Travis mentioned SmartLogic that they use for CMV Inspections and maybe we could apply that to this form.

  • Is it possible to query DAIT and get the results of the incident?

  • Could TraCS send an amend to DAIT or DOJ? If either of those agencies change the incident, LEA's never know.

    • Example: A bar fight in the parking lot. No broken bones, and 30 people in the parking lot. The two would be arrested for battery and disorderly conduct. Police get a call for noise/disruption

  • >>>pulled over for OWI and Meth, Group A possession or OWI as a group B (group b more interesting than A in this situation)

  • >>> group b would not be reported to the FBI only if they were arrested

  • Need a better definition of Arrest (DOJ trying to get one from FBI)

    • If notified of a charge and given to DA or in physical custody and being sent to the DA

    • IF NTC, it doesn't go to the DA

    • If you hand a citation in person, then it's arrest

    • If you mail a citation, that's not considered an arrest

Statutes

• Traffic

  • Felonies, forfeitures and misdemeanors

  • Everything

• Non-Traffic

  • CCAP has about 12,000 statutes (chargeable)

  • TraCS currently has 6,000

  • No felonies

• DNR

  • Expire all the felonies

  • No felonies

• TraCS plans to build a new Felonies Table

• Where do we put the misdemeanor statutes?

  • Put them on the Non Traffic and let the law enforcement agency decide how to complete it

  • Geri want to have this done by this fall

Project Time Line

• What can we implement for it to be useful in the Fall?

• Goal for the Fall release:

  • Have all the fields that law enforcement, DOJ, DAIT, and other partners want in the form.

  • Have a way to send eReferrals to DAIT

  • Have simple validation rules to eliminate some egregious errors

2:45 Next Meeting Date

April 9th and April 16th were suggested up in Stevens Point. If Stevens Point PD doesn't have availability, then UWSP will find a room.

Agenda - April 16, 2020

Thursday, April 16, 2020

11:15 AM

TraCS Incident Form Work Group Agenda 

Meeting Remotely

9:00     Introductions

9:10     Review last meeting notes

9:20     Property Form Demo

10:00   Break

10:15  Incident Form Demo w/discussions on prefilled scenarios 

12:00   Lunch

12:45  Violation Search Categories

1:00 F2 Help Volunteers

1:15   Outstanding Questions

2:30    Discuss how we’ll proceed after our 1 year commitment.

2:45     Next Meeting Date

Raw Notes-April 16, 2020 - Inc - chat comments

Wednesday, April 15, 2020

8:09 PM

• Geri reviewed the last meeting notes.

• Extra Tribal information follow up from last meeting

  • No extra information is needed

• Property form

• Transformation document

• Groups working on:

  • Subject

  • Relationship

• Adding Relations group

• Will be working on getting a testing version available

• Adding Batch validation rules for eReferral

• Questions?

• Pulled out the drugs, vehicle and other and put into property attachment form

• Could/Would this be used for the arrest form?

  • Tim: this could be used for any number of forms. This would be very versatile

  • Dar: Could there be options added in the future?

    • Yes

  • Can add up to 99 items.

  • May need to add a Citation Number field as well.

  • Reviewed adding and subtracting the groups.

• What if you make the form number a "general" number that can be used for any form?

  • Used to link other forms

  • If it was just 1 field, could you tell what form it was from?

    • Not really, only the ELCI has a distinctive number.

  • Jeni: For the general number, would a case number be associated with the property form?

    • Tim: Yes it should, some agencies use their own system. Leave this as a user defined number.

  • Police number is available on the form for your use.

  • Travis: If we have a general number field, would there be a drop down list of the forms?

    • Geri could add the form during a replicate, but a drop down may be hard to do.

  • Decision:

    • Remove the form number fields.

  • Would the form number be the form where common information was taken from for replicate?

    • Most likely, but could be any form that is open.

  • Stan: Form numbers field doesn't matter to me. We mainly use the Police Number.

• Vehicle Group

  • Review of each field within the group.

  • Impound Location field

    • Should this be an agency controlled list?

      • Yes, create an agency controlled drop down list.

  • You can use the master index to find information on the recovered vehicle.

  • Mac: Are you filtering out vehicles from the dropdown?

    • Yes, that is what is intended.

    • Aircraft, bicycles, farm equipment, construction equipment, water craft, atv

    • Tim:

• Tim: What is the purpose of identifying vehicles, is it for reporting to the feds?

  • We need to figure out a standard to use.

• Kevin:

• Comments?

  • Decision: Put information into the F2 help.

  • What standard should be used?

• Dar: Definition by statute may be tough as DNR and DOT may define them differently.

• [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:00 AM]  Dempsey, Mac: 

• This may need more research, and will be in contact through email.

• Master index search for finding a stolen vehicle information demo.

  • Can be search using partial fields.

  • When vehicle is found, a history of all incidents is available.

  • This can vehicle can be put into the form.

  • New master index coming out later that will contain additional search items, like money, etc.

  • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:06 AM]  Lutz, Jeni: 

 [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:07 AM]  Tim Strohbusch: 

Break.

• Modification made since last meetings

  • Added eReferral Y/N field.

  • eReferral Agency field

    • Some agencies send to different DA so they do not have a default DA.

    • This is used to select the DA to send to

  • Total fields

  • Questions:

    • Travis: Can there be a ini setting to set a DA to send to? There is a concern that if an officer defaults the DA the officer may not reset for the next county.

      • This is something to look into this option

    • Brenda: eReferral select the county from the ORI to send to.

      • This wouldn't work for statewide agencies.

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:34 AM]  Tim Strohbusch: 

• This is something we could look at.

• Offense

  • Can search statute numbers and have that information populate fields.

  • Agency Category and Sub Category fields are agency tables

• Subject section

  • Individual type changed to Individual and Non-Individual.

    • Nonindividual when checked will remove non needed fields.

    • Individual will open up specific fields.

  • Jeni: Is the ATN field a required field?

    • No, but if you could get it, it would be helpful and wanted.

  • Prescription drug will open up the drug group.

  • Associated Offenses

  • Arrested

    • Associated offenses is the same list used above.

    • Added the Rental Vehicle question.

  • Questions:

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:45 AM]  Tim Strohbusch: 

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:45 AM]  Bryan Hasse: 

• Victim Group

  • A few groups will open automatically base on violation selected.

  • I.e. injuries if needed.

  • Police officer selected then the LEA group will open.

  • Relationship group does not open automatically.

    • Based on the number of individual selected.

    • Each one will have their own group.

      • Officer will add the relationship

      • Officer will add the associated offenses.

  • Question

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:50 AM]  Lutz, Jeni: 

• Most likely will be a required field.

• [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:52 AM]  Travis: 

• Brenda: This is not a required field.

• Other Persons

  • Added an Officer Witness type of involvement.

    • If selected the officer information group opens.

  • Officer ID is a required field.

• #1 - 5 stolen vehicle scenario

  • Demo of this one with a prefilled TraCS form.

  • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:58 AM]  Shawn: 

• Will have up to 5000. Over that it should be an attachment.

• This information shown is what Madison PD completed, what would Dane County fill out?

  • Jeni: Dane County would complete a report, but Madison would be filling out UCR information.

  • Agency that had the stolen vehicles would be completing the incident form.

• #2 - Fraud

  • Review of the Fraud prefilled form.

  • Questions:

    • Is the relationship between the church and the individual

      • We normally only need to see relationships between 2 individuals

    • Would it be correct to drop the relationship to subject information when one is not an individual?

    • Should Victims relationship to subject be removed when one is an Non Individual?

      • Stan: Would like to keep the section, but not make it required.

      • Most agree with Stan. Keep the section.

    • Alesha: What is the consensus of the group with keeping the relationship field when on of the parties is Non Individual?

      • Add a Not Applicable as a choice and leave the field open as it could be useful to the agencies.

      • Do not make it mandatory.

• #3 - Fight

  • Review the fight prefilled form.

  • Questions:

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:18 AM]  Alesha: 

• Question will be discussed later in this meeting. See Geri's questions document.

• Would LE have completed this differently?

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:23 AM]  Alesha: 

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:23 AM]  Lutz, Jeni: 

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:23 AM]  Bryan Hasse: 

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:24 AM]  Tim Strohbusch: 

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:25 AM]  Lutz, Jeni: 

• Most agencies would only create one incident number for most incidents.

• What field is the Case Name?

  • It is the Police Number field.

  • What is the character limit?

    • Don't know off the top of my head.

• Scenario #4 - Fight between 3

  • Review of prefilled form

  • Questions:

    • None

    • Comments ranged from thumbs up to looks good.

• Scenario #5 - Underage Party

  • Review of the prefilled underage party form

  • Questions?

    • Looks good.

• Scenario #6 - Car Jacking

  • Review of the Car Jacking prefilled form

  • Questions \ Comments:

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:37 AM]  Alesha: 

• That would be fine, the robbery would intimate the intimidation.

• Most officers would put it in differently, the way DOJ would like.

• The flow of the form is definitely taking shape.

• Scenario #7 - Heroin with a stolen vehicle.

  • Review of the Heroin with a stolen vehicle prefilled form

  • Questions \ Comments:

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:43 AM]  Alesha: 

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:44 AM]  Bryan Hasse: 

• Jeni: It get sent under 1 incident.

• Alesha: Which charge is used when sent when there are multiple charges?

• Jeni: It is a hierarchy logic from the RMS vendor and we cannot change it.

• [‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:45 AM]  Tim Strohbusch: 

 [‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:47 AM]  Bryan Hasse: 

• Violation Search Categories

  • Review of the Category list document

  • We try to categorize the searches.

  • TraCS has issues when there are more than 25 search categories.

  • Does this list look correct?

• Questions / Comments:

  • Tim: First list could use a Local Ordinance in the category.

  • Geri: Local ordinances have their own list.

  • When would we be able to start testing?

    • Most likely in about 2 weeks.

• Lunch - back at 12:45.

• Darlene led the discussion

• Help is usually created by the form sponsor.

• If DOJ has some we would welcome it.

• It is important to have LE review/write/proof the content of each file to make sure it make sense to the officers / staff who would be completing the form and/or RMS

• Volunteers

  • Brenda will provide whatever is needed

  • Bryan Hasse

  • Time Strobusch

  • Jeni Lutz

  • Kevin Barman

• When testing the form, input on the F2 help is always appreciated.

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 12:52 PM]  Bryan Hasse: 

Similar to replicate

Wait until this is rolling well, then add this portion.

DOJ and DOT will meet before the next meeting.

• DAIT can tap into da decisions

• IF this is available, DOJ would tap into this and not have to have the agency to this. 

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 1:31 PM]  Tim Strohbusch: 

Notes-April 16, 2020

Wednesday, April 15, 2020

8:09 PM

• Geri reviewed the last meeting notes.

• Extra Tribal information follow up from last meeting

  • No extra information is needed

• Property form

• Transformation document

• Groups working on:

  • Subject

  • Relationship

• Adding Relations group

• Will be working on getting a testing version available

• Adding Batch validation rules for eReferral

• Questions?

• Pulled out the drugs, vehicle and other and put into property attachment form

• Could/Would this be used for the arrest form?

  • Tim: this could be used for any number of forms. This would be very versatile

  • Dar: Could there be options added in the future?

    • Yes

  • Can add up to 99 items.

  • May need to add a Citation Number field as well.

  • Reviewed adding and subtracting the groups.

• What if you make the form number a "general" number that can be used for any form?

  • Used to link other forms

  • If it was just 1 field, could you tell what form it was from?

    • Not really, only the ELCI has a distinctive number.

  • Jeni: For the general number, would a case number be associated with the property form?

    • Tim: Yes it should, some agencies use their own system. Leave this as a user defined number.

  • Police number is available on the form for your use.

  • Travis: If we have a general number field, would there be a drop down list of the forms?

    • Geri could add the form during a replicate, but a drop down may be hard to do.

  • Decision:

    • Remove the form number fields.

  • Would the form number be the form where common information was taken from for replicate?

    • Most likely, but could be any form that is open.

  • Stan: Form numbers field doesn't matter to me. We mainly use the Police Number.

• Vehicle Group

  • Review of each field within the group.

  • Impound Location field

    • Should this be an agency controlled list?

      • Yes, create an agency controlled drop down list.

  • You can use the master index to find information on the recovered vehicle.

  • Mac: Are you filtering out vehicles from the dropdown?

    • Yes, that is what is intended.

    • Aircraft, bicycles, farm equipment, construction equipment, water craft, atv

    • Tim: could we define vehicle as anything that can/should be registered with dot or DNR???

• Tim: What is the purpose of identifying vehicles, is it for reporting to the feds?

  • We need to figure out a standard to use.

• Kevin:

• Comments?

  • Decision: Put information into the F2 help.

  • What standard should be used?

• Dar: Definition by statute may be tough as DNR and DOT may define them differently.

• [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:00 AM]  Dempsey, Mac: 

• This will need more research. TraCS staff will research and follow up with in email for comments/suggestions.

• Master index search for finding a stolen vehicle information demo.

  • Can be search using partial fields.

  • When vehicle is found, a history of all incidents is available.

  • This can vehicle can be put into the form.

  • New master index coming out later that will contain additional search items, like money, etc.

  • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:06 AM]  Lutz, Jeni: 

 [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:07 AM]  Tim Strohbusch: 

• Modification made since last meetings

  • Added eReferral Y/N field.

  • eReferral Agency field

    • Some agencies send to different DA so they do not have a default DA.

    • This is used to select the DA to send to

  • Total fields

  • Questions:

    • Travis: Can there be a .ini setting to set a DA to send to? There is a concern that if an officer defaults the DA the officer may not reset for the next county.

      • This is something to look into this option

    • Brenda: eReferral select the county from the ORI to send to.

      • This wouldn't work for statewide agencies.

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:34 AM]  Tim Strohbusch: 

• This is something we could look at.

• Offense

  • Can search statute numbers and have that information populate fields.

  • Agency Category and Sub Category fields are agency tables

• Subject section

  • Individual type changed to Individual and Non-Individual.

    • Nonindividual when checked will remove non needed fields.

    • Individual will open up specific fields.

  • Jeni: Is the ATN field a required field?

    • No, but if you could get it, it would be helpful and wanted.

  • Prescription drug will open up the drug group.

  • Associated Offenses

  • Arrested

    • Associated offenses is the same list used above.

    • Added the Rental Vehicle question.

  • Victim Group

    • A few groups will open automatically based on violation selected.

    • I.e. injuries if needed.

    • Police officer selected then the LEA group will open.

    • Relationship group does not open automatically.

      • Based on the number of individual selected.

      • Each one will have their own group.

        • Officer will add the relationship

        • Officer will add the associated offenses.

    • Question

      • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:50 AM]  Lutz, Jeni: 

• Most likely will be a required field.

• [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:52 AM]  Travis: 

• Brenda: This is not a required field.

• Other Persons

  • Added an Officer Witness type of involvement.

    • If selected the officer information group opens.

  • Officer ID is a required field.

• Scenario #1 - MULTI STOLEN VEHICLE: Madison PD had 5 vehicles stolen out of their jurisdiction. Madison PD was able to recover 2 out of the 5 vehicles a week later, and Dane County Sheriff’s Office recovered the 3 remaining vehicles a month later

  • Reviewed a prefilled TraCS form.

  • Questions:

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 10:58 AM]  Shawn: 

• Will have up to 5000. Over that it should be an attachment.

• This information shown is what Madison PD completed, what would Dane County fill out?

  • Jeni: Dane County would complete a report, but Madison would be filling out UCR information.

  • Agency that had the stolen vehicles would be completing the incident form.

• Scenario #2 - FRAUD: Carrie is new to town and attends a new church, introduces herself during a service, and talks about how sick she is with a life-threatening illness and how she is having trouble financially. The church takes a collection and gives the money to Carrie. Carrie is not sick, takes the money, and never returns to the church.

  • Reviewed a prefilled TraCS form.

  • Questions:

    • Is the relationship between the church and the individual

      • We normally only need to see relationships between 2 individuals

    • Would it be correct to drop the relationship to subject information when one is not an individual?

    • Should Victims relationship to subject be removed when one is an Non Individual?

      • Stan: Would like to keep the section, but not make it required.

      • Most agree with Stan. Keep the section.

    • Alesha: What is the consensus of the group with keeping the relationship field when one of the parties is Non Individual?

      • Add a Not Applicable as a choice and leave the field open as it could be useful to the agencies.

      • Do not make it mandatory.

• Scenario #3 - FIGHT W/OFFICER: Brandon and Simon are fighting each other, each throwing punches (no serious injury). An officer arrives, breaks them up, and Brandon punches the officer after Simon is handcuffed and placed on the patrol vehicle. Brandon flees

  • Reviewed a prefilled TraCS form.

  • Questions:

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:18 AM]  Alesha: 

• Question will be discussed later in this meeting. See Geri's questions document.

• Would LE have completed this differently?

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:23 AM]  Alesha: 

[‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:23 AM]  Lutz, Jeni: 

 [‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:25 AM]  Lutz, Jeni: 

• Most agencies would only create one incident number for most incidents.

• What field is the Case Name?

  • It is the Police Number field.

  • The character limit is 20 characters

• Scenario #4 - THREE WAY FIGHT: Samantha and Tori were punching Olivia and Olivia was punching both of them back. Tori backed off and Samantha kept punching Olivia until she had broken bones. Samantha and Tori were both charged with assault and Tori was also charged with possession of heroin

  • Reviewed a prefilled TraCS form

  • Questions:

    • Comments ranged from thumbs up to looks good.

• Scenario #5 - UNDERAGE PARTY: Police were called to a house for suspicious activity. Three juveniles were cited for underage drinking,  possession of paraphernalia, and drug possession. There were only trace amounts of drugs on the paraphernalia, but it was clear there was recent usage activity

  • Reviewed a prefilled TraCS form

  • Questions?

    • Looks good.

• Scenario #6 - CAR JACKING: Dutch held Arthur at gunpoint until Arthur gave up the keys to his car, which Dutch used to steal his car.

  • Reviewed a prefilled TraCS form

  • Questions:

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:37 AM]  Alesha: 

• That would be fine, the robbery would intimate the intimidation.

• Most officers would put it in differently, the way DOJ would like.

• The flow of the form is definitely taking shape.

• Scenario #7 - HEROIN STOLEN VEH: Josh was pulled over and charged for OWI, possession of heroin (seized), and stolen property for driving without owner’s consent (recovered stolen MV).

  • Review of the Heroin with a stolen vehicle prefilled form

  • Questions \ Comments:

    • [‎4/‎16/‎2020 11:43 AM]  Alesha: